Archive

Posts Tagged ‘California’

Litigation Claims in California

February 2nd, 2009

How Claims Litigation in California Works by Manuel Salvacion

Accident claims in California are litigated under the ‘tort liability system’. This system governs how pain and suffering claims are going to be resolved. Under the system, a jury decides on the amount of damages to be paid to an accident victim. The litigation jury works together with insurance companies to determine the value of accident damages and based on it, pay the most reasonable amount for settlement.

California law categorizes damages into two: economic damages and non-economic damages. Between the two, non-economic damage is more controversial because they are not easy to define and quantify, hence it makes up a substantial part of the victim’s recovery efforts. Economic damages are those that can be recovered easily; they can also be computed in mathematical terms.

In vehicle accidents cases, economic damages often include the following:
Medical expenses
Lost wages
Lost earning capacity
Loss of ability to provide household services
Damage to real property
Loss of use of real property
Damage to personal property
Loss or destruction of personal property
Damage to personal property having a special value
Loss of use of personal property
Lost profits

On the other hand, non-economic damages may include:

Physical pain
Mental suffering
Emotional distress
Loss of consortium (loss of companionship and services)

To be able to evaluate damages, the jury and the insurance companies assign values on non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. Values are determined by several factors:

Job/ Income - A claimant’s job or occupation and income may influence the jury on the amount of damages to be awarded to him.
Age - Age can also give a person greater consideration in claim. The jury when awarding higher payments gives older persons preferential treatment.
Legal assistance - The jury also considers your choice of lawyer as a factor in awarding payments.
Where the case is filed -Juries in urban areas usually award higher payments than in small towns and rural areas.
Attitude/ witness quality - Behavior and manner of the victim during hearing can affect the decision of a jury when giving out payment.
Pre-existing injury - A claimant suffering from an old injury might receive lower payment for damages.
Medical treatment - The jury often awards a high value payment to claimants who can support their claims with medical records and statements from doctors.

  motorcycle accidents ny brain injury lawyers nyc brain injury lawyers ny

California Highway Design - Your Legal Rights : Malpractice Case
In California a claim against a public entity must be filed within six months of the event. If the statute of limitations expires, your right to pursue a claim against the entity may be forever barred.

$19 Million Recovered from AMEC Construction Management | Kansas
This Will Settle Litigation Regarding Fraud, False Claims, Kickbacks & Re-procurement Costs on Federal Construction Contracts. … during the litigation. ACMI also entered guilty pleas to felony fraud in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in December 2000 and in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in March 2002 for the bond frauds involved in today’s civil settlement. Tools: Printer Friendly Page


Ear To The Ground: California Court of Appeal redefines

Most second-hand smoke litigation in California has been pursuant to Proposition 65. However, in Birke, a minor (through her guardian ad litem) brought a public nuisance claim that her apartment complex permitted smoking in a number.

Arizona Bus Crash Accident: Attorneys, Lawyers: Your Rights Under
Important Notice: You may have less than six months to file a claim arising out of the Metrolink accident under California law. You should seek legal advice from a qualified attorney immediately to understand your legal rights.

Rail Passenger Association of California & Nevada :: Tracking
Some cars are to be written off…but they can’t, either because of litigation or insurance claims.” According to the Nov-Dec Amtrak Ink “a program is underway to put 12 stored Amfleet I cars back in service.” ONLY 12?

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Accident Injuries , , , , , , , , , ,

California Car Accident Lawsuit Headed To Trial

January 28th, 2009

San Luis Obispo, California Car Accident Lawsuit Headed To Trial

A car accident lawsuit that’s headed to a San Luis Obispo, California court alleges that it was a dangerous road that caused the accident as much as drugs and alcohol. Six years after the accident that left him with severe head and body injuries, Aaron Gurican, then just 17-years-old, is charging that the county maintained an unsafe road without streetlights that was at least partly responsible for causing the drunk driving accident.

On April 9th, 2002, Gurican was leaving his girlfriend’s house, on his motorcycle at night. He had no way of knowing that headed straight at him was a car driven by Mathew Wenz, also 17 years old. Wenz was in the wrong lane, and when his car slammed into the motorcycle, it knocked Gurican off. Wenz, it was found after the motorcycle accident, had been drinking, although his alcohol limit was .07, which is just below the legal limit for an adult of legal drinking age. However, Wenz was a minor, and any amount of alcohol in his system was too much. He had also been smoking pot earlier that day, it was found.

Wenz claimed he never saw Gurican, and thought he’d run over an animal in the dark. Gurican suffered extensive head injures, and today is confined to a wheelchair with very limited movement in his head and shoulders. He was wearing a helmet at the time of the car accident, but his motorcycle had an improperly functioning headlight. Gurican however, says he had a flashlight strapped onto the front of the motorcycle.

The lawsuit names not only Wenz, but also the San Luis Obispo County for his injuries. In earlier attempts to take the case to trial, Gurican’s attorneys had claimed that the stretch of road where the car accident occurred was dangerous, and had no streetlights. In addition, there were experts who came forward to testify on Gurican’s behalf, that the road was constructed in such a manner that motorists were encouraged to take a wrong turn. There was also a bush that blocked visibility, and this fact was confirmed by Wenz’s testimony, according to which, he never saw Gurican.

The court however, ruled that there was not enough evidence for Gurican to take the case to trial. Two years later, Gurican appealed, and that court found that the evidence indeed proved that the case could, in fact, go to trial.

Gurican’s jury trial will begin in December. The lawsuit cites a sum of $7 million in damages, as well as for expenses for taking care of Gurican who is expected to need care for the rest of his life. The county has refused to settle, and is looking forward to a trial, their attorneys say.

The county’s argument is that the responsibility for the car accident rests solely on the shoulders of Wenz and Gurican. The former was drunk, and even had drugs in his system, while the latter was driving without a proper headlight. Even so, there has been evidence that there was a design flaw in the dangerous road that enabled wrong turns, as well as helped lessen the degree of the turn. It seems like there was more than drugs, alcohol and a missing headlight that was at play in this California car accident.

By: Robert Reeves

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

  truck accident attorney palm beach county latino personal injury tv ads tv commercials for personal injury law firms

Families File Suit in Fatal San Diego Navy Helicopter Crash
Families File Suit in Fatal San Diego Navy Helicopter Crash :: Southern California Car Accident Lawyer Blog. … Relatives of three sailors, who died after a helicopter crashed off the San Diego coast during a U.S. Navy training mission, have filed a product liability lawsuit against seven companies that manufactured and sold the aircraft and its parts. The four victims who died in that crash were: Lt. j.g. Laura J. Mankey of West Hills; Lt. Adam Dyer, 28,

California Car Accident and Injury Lawyer Blog | Man Sentenced
While a criminal court can hold a person responsible for violations of state laws and can punish him for these, the outcome of such a lawsuit does nothing to comfort those whose lives have been turned upside down by the accident. … These damages will be calculated by a California car accident attorney, adding up to a full value for a claim. The Reeves Law Group is a law firm with offices throughout California dedicated exclusively to the representation ..

California Car Accident and Injury Lawyer Blog | Parents of

The parents of a Sacramento teenager who died after a motorcycle accident at a motocross track have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the track operators

CHP high speed Fontana neighborhood car chase leaves three boys
CHP high speed Fontana neighborhood car chase leaves three boys dead! 2009-01-29 23:04:33 (GMT) (JusticeNewsFlash.com - Auto Accident, Justice News Flash). Print & Social Options … Los Angeles, CA (JusticeNewsFlash.com)–A 15 year-old underage driver crashed his parent’s car into a Fontana home on Wednesday night while fleeing a San Bernardino California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer. The youth driver and two boys ages 11 and 9 were all killed in the.

The Reeves Law Group is a California law firm of dedicated California Accident Lawyers & Personal Injury Attorneys. Need a California Car Accident Injury Lawyer, Auto Accident Attorney, or a California Motorcycle Accident Lawyer? Call (800) 644-8000 for a free consultation.

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Injury Lawsuit and Law Firms , , , ,

Car Accident Attorney And Good Samaritans

January 28th, 2009

Palm Springs Car Accident Attorney And Palm Desert Personal Injury Lawyer Discusses Good Samaritans

You may have thought it was safe to help motorcycle accident victims, pull injured people and puppy dogs out of burning cars and help people out of burning airplanes. That may no longer be the case.

Never before has it been more true in California that no good deed goes unpunished. California Auto Accident Good Samaritans beware - save a life, help a car accident victim or a person in any other type of car or motorcycle or truck accident and if you accidentally cause a personal injury or some additional harm to the person, now you too can be sued by a lawyer on behalf of the victim you tried to help anywhere in California.

The new ruling comes by way of the highest court in California, the California Supreme Court, which means that the only way this interpretation of the law can be changed is by a subsequent ruling by the same court, which is unlikely, or by the State Legislature, which, even though it has its share of lawyers, right now can’t even agree on a budget.

The Court’s 4-3 ruling on December 18, 2008 comes as a result of an auto accident that occurred on Halloween night in 2004. A women was a passenger in a car that ran into a light pole at 45 mph. Her friend, who was in the car behind her, pulled the first woman by her arm from the wreckage in the belief that the car was about to explode and then allegedly dropped her. Unfortunately, the woman’s injuries left her a paraplegic and she sued her friend who pulled her out of the non-exploding car in the belief that the Good Samaritan’s rescue efforts caused her paralysis.

The Supreme Court was forced to interpret the California Good Samaritan law which is in the section of the state code dealing with emergency medical care and which states, ‘No person who in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency care at the scene of an emergency shall be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission.’

Interpreting that law, the California Supreme Court held that the state’s Good Samaritan law only protects you from being sued if you render medical care at the scene of an emergency. If on the other hand you are just rendering aid or help in a non-medical way, such as pulling someone out of a burning car, you can now be sued. That doesn’t mean you will be found liable. That’s for a judge or jury to decide. But the fact that you can be sued, means that without insurance to protect you, you will undoubtedly need an attorney or lawyer to represent you, you will need to pay that lawyer his or her attorney’s fees and costs to defend you, which in a typical personal injury case can cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Worse yet, if by chance your actions as a Good Samaritan cause significant injury and a judge or jury of your peers decides that you really botched it when you took the actions that you took, perhaps in a mistaken belief that you were doing a good deed, a court of law could find you responsible for hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars if the resulting injuries are severe.

Whether or not any of these situations were covered by the Good Samaritan Law in California to begin with, it is possible that these situations could also now put you into hot water and into court as a possible defendant in a personal injury lawsuit:

1. Donations of bad food - Have you ever given old canned food to a food drive and failed to look at the dates on the cans? What if the food in those cans were beyond the expiration date and causes food poisoning? You might be held responsible in such a case, Good Samaritan Law, notwithstanding. Beer that is past it’s expiration date probably won’t be a problem for you but if someone serves it to a minor who drinks it and gets into a car accident, the server may face a lawsuit.

2. Donations of organs - Say you are still alive and donate an organ that fails after it is given to a sick patient or you give an organ upon your death that does no more good to the person it is given to than it did for you? Sounds like the deed of a Good Samaritan. And if you drank too much wine while you were alive and your shot liver is given to someone else upon your death, your estate may regret all that wine you drank while you were alive if the liver recipient doesn’t do well with your alcohol soaked liver. Still, we hope this is not the case.

3. Jumping into a swimming pool to save a drowning person - If, in pulling that person to the side or lifting them out of the pool you cause them injury, you can clearly be sued under this new ruling. And, if you proceed to give the person artificial respiration, but botch that as well, or if you botch it so badly, a jury or judge decides that you weren’t even rendering medical emergency treatment, a vindictive jury may hold you responsible for causing the swimmer’s death or additional injuries, such as brain damage.

4. What if you’ve been watching too many movies and you knock a person down or jump onto them to protect them from being shot by a bank robber running away and in so doing break their neck? Guess what? You may have just won yourself another lawsuit.

5. And if you swerve to avoid hitting a dog and hit another car instead? I hate to tell you, but in this situation, courts and insurance companies will almost always find you to be at fault, in the belief that a dog’s life has little value (this is not my opinion) and if you cause injury to another human just to save the life of an animal, you take the fall.

6. If you help someone out of a burning airplane, push them out the door into the chute and they take a header onto the tarmac, guess what? Some lawyer may slap you with a lawsuit.

7. If you see someone choking on a piece of meat in a restaurant and rush to perform the Heimlich maneuver, don’t bruise their ribs getting the person to cough up that piece of food. Otherwise, you guessed it. An attorney’s lawsuit may be served on you with your next meal.

8. Finally, what about EMS helicopter pilots? There has been a rash nationwide of EMS helicopters crashing as they transport accident victims from the scenes of their auto accidents to nearby hospitals. Since the pilot is not rendering medical treatment, it’s likely that they can be sued and can be found at fault if a judge or jury finds them responsible for some negligence in their piloting of their helicopter.

Can a person be sued for not coming to another’s aid? Apparently not, according to the California Supreme Court decision. But a person who does come to the aid of another has a ‘duty to exercise due care.’

If you do pull someone from a burning car, here are some facetious do’s and don’ts:

1) First, do not yank the car accident victim’s arm out of their socket when pulling someone from a burning car. Instead, first put on gloves, put on a fire retardant suit, and then with the flames licking at your suit, gently apply a neck brace, back brace, full body brace and with full medical precautions, gently lift the person from the burning wreckage. In the event, you see gas seeping from the gas tank and flames getting closer to the gas, move faster.

2) Once you remove the auto accident victim from the burning car, do not drop them on the sidewalk. Instead, gently place them on a warm blanket (not the wet grass where they might catch a cold).

3) Immediately, if not sooner, start applying bandages to every part of their body, thus qualifying your actions as emergency medical care. If you can do this while gently lifting them from the burning car, even better.

4) Request bystanders to take pictures with their cell phones of you applying bandages to the personal injury victim and acting like a doctor, even if you don’t have a medical license. If by chance you are not a doctor or paramedic, quickly go online, take a crash medical course to become a paramedic, and be sure you pass the test. Then print out your license for all to see.

5) Call only the finest medical personnel in the state to the scene of the accident in case your 911 call results in medical malpractice being performed by a newly licensed paramedic and your call is determined not to be an act of administering medical care in an emergency. Obviously, you will want to get onto the internet with your phone or computer and research the local medical professionals. If you can’t get onto the internet to research who would be the best emergency personnel to call to the scene, make the 911 call anonymously.

6) If the car that you thought was going to explode just doesn’t seem to want to explode, and you were a little rough in pulling the auto accident victim from their car, you may want to call a tow truck driver to push the car further away as this may prevent other injuries and help your situation. Just be sure to first ensure that any resulting explosion doesn’t hurt any bystanders or the victim you yanked from the car.

7) Keep administering medical care to the vehicle accident victim until medical personnel arrive. Since you’ve administered medical care, even if you are not a doctor, the car or truck or motorcycle accident victim is potentially now your patient, and there are rules about abandoning patients.

8) In the event the auto or motorcycle accident victim you’ve saved is delirious, you may also want to provide psychiatric counseling to them, which could conceivably also be considered medical treatment.

9) If weather conditions are bad or it is nighttime, and an EMS helicopter arrives at the scene instead of an ambulance, in view of the rash of EMS helicopter accidents in the U.S. you may want to suggest to the accident victim that he or she walks to the hospital as it may be safer. However, keep applying bandages throughout the walk and again, do not abandon your patient.

10) Proceed only to the hospital in your area with the best mortality rate. After walking ten or fifteen miles after a horrific car accident, because you stupidly declined medical treatment at the scene, you do not want to walk your patient into a hospital with a high medical malpractice rate or one with a higher fatality rate for car accident victims than ninety percent of the other hospitals in the state.

The California Supreme Court decision is rewriting the rules of liability in auto and car accidents, in motorcycle and truck crashes and in personal injury situations in general in the golden state and may make people think twice before acting as a Good Samaritan.

If you’ve had a personal injury accident in San Diego, Orange County, Palm Springs, Rancho Cucamonga, Santa Barbara, Yorba Linda, Tustin, Ventura, Oxnard, Los Angeles, Newport Beach, Anaheim, Irvine, Huntington Beach, Corona del Mar, Laguna Beach, Santa Ana, Orange, Fullerton, Costa Mesa, or anywhere in Southern California, we have the knowledge and resources to be your California Personal Injury Lawyer and your Southern CA Personal Injury Attorney. Be sure to hire a California law firm with auto, motorcycle, truck, bicycle, pedestrian, car, bus, train, boat and airplane accident experience, wrongful death experience and insurance law expertise who can ensure you are properly represented and get the compensation you deserve.

ft lauderdale motorcycle accident attorney

By: R. Sebastian Gibson

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

 

Abuse at Minnesota Nursing Home Makes Work "Fun" - UPDATE
Brianna Marie Broitzman and Ashton Michelle Larson made their first court appearance today for the alleged abuse of fifteen residents of Good Samaritan Society nursing home. Neither girl entered a plea on the pending charges. … Iowa Nursing Home Fined for Falls Friendship Haven in Fort Dodge, Iowa was slapped with a… January 20, 2009 2:03 PM Abuse at Minnesota Nursing Home Makes Work "Fun" - UPDATE We discussed the teenage abusers at Good Samaritan Society.

Iowa Nursing Home Fined for Falls :: Nursing Home Abuse Lawyer Blog
On March 25, the same resident suffered another injury when the resident stood up in the restroom and stumbled backward, striking the head on the wall. The resident died on April 2. In another incident involving a resident, Agnes Thompson … Abuse at Minnesota Nursing Home Makes Work "Fun" - UPDATE We discussed the teenage abusers at Good Samaritan Society… January 20, 2009 1:33 PM Texas Nursing Home Maintenance Worker Sentenced to Forty Years for Sexual Assaults

Tennessee Veterans Home Settles With U.S. Justice Department
Tennessee Veterans Home Settles With US Justice Department :: Nursing Home Abuse Lawyer Blog. … Veterans Home Settles With U.S. Justice Department The State of Tennessee and the Department of Justice have… January 20, 2009 2:24 PM Iowa Nursing Home Fined for Falls Friendship Haven in Fort Dodge, Iowa was slapped with a… January 20, 2009 2:03 PM Abuse at Minnesota Nursing Home Makes Work "Fun" - UPDATE We discussed the teenage abusers at Good Samaritan Society.

Visit our website at www.sebastiangibsonlaw.com if you have a personal injury legal matter of any kind or if you have lost a loved one in a wrongful death accident. We have the knowledge and resources to be your

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Accident Settlement , , , ,